**Open Review**. We want your feedback to make the book better for you and other students. You may annotate some text by selecting it with the cursor and then click the on the pop-up menu. You can also see the annotations of others: click the in the upper right hand corner of the page

## 16.4 Volatility Clustering and Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity

Financial time series often exhibit a behavior that is known as *volatility clustering*: the volatility changes over time and its degree shows a tendency to persist, i.e., there are periods of low volatility and periods where volatility is high. Econometricians call this *autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity*. Conditional heteroskedasticity is an interesting property because it can be exploited for forecasting the variance of future periods.

As an example, we consider daily changes in the Whilshire 5000 stock index. The data is available for download at the Federal Reserve Economic Data Base. For consistency with the book we download data from 1989-29-12 to 2013-12-31 (choosing this somewhat larger time span is necessary since later on we will be working with daily changes of the series).

The following code chunk shows how to format the data and how to reproduce Figure 16.3 of the book.

```
# import data on the Wilshire 5000 index
read.csv2("data/Wilshire5000.csv",
W5000 <-stringsAsFactors = F,
header = T,
sep = ",",
na.strings = ".")
# transform the columns
$DATE <- as.Date(W5000$DATE)
W5000$WILL5000INDFC <- as.numeric(W5000$WILL5000INDFC)
W5000
# remove NAs
na.omit(W5000)
W5000 <-
# compute daily percentage changes
data.frame("Date" = W5000$DATE,
W5000_PC <-"Value" = as.numeric(Delt(W5000$WILL5000INDFC) * 100))
na.omit(W5000_PC) W5000_PC <-
```

```
# plot percentage changes
plot(W5000_PC,
ylab = "Percent",
main = "Daily Percentage Changes",
type="l",
col = "steelblue",
lwd = 0.5)
# add horizontal line at y = 0
abline(0, 0)
```

The series of daily percentage changes in the Wilshire index seems to randomly fluctuate around zero, meaning there is little autocorrelation. This is confirmed by a plot of the sample autocorrelation function.

```
# plot sample autocorrelation of daily percentage changes
acf(W5000_PC$Value, main = "Wilshire 5000 Series")
```

In Figure 16.2 we see that autocorrelations are rather weak so that it is difficult to predict future outcomes using, e.g., an AR model.

However, there is visual evidence in 16.1 that the series of returns exhibits conditional heteroskedasticity since we observe volatility clustering. For some applications it is useful to measure and forecast these patterns. This can be done using models which assume that the volatility can be described by an autoregressive process.

### ARCH and GARCH Models

Consider \[Y_t = \beta_0 + \beta_1 Y_{t-1} + \gamma_1 X_{t-1} + u_t,\] an ADL(\(1\),\(1\)) regression model. The econometrician Robert Engle (1982) proposed to model \(\sigma^2_t = Var(u_t | u_{t-1},u_{t-2},\ldots)\), the conditional variance of the error \(u_t\) given its past, by an order \(p\) distributed lag model,
\[\begin{align}
\sigma^2_t = \alpha_0 + \alpha_1 u_{t-1}^2 + \alpha_2 u_{t-2}^2 + \dots + \alpha_p u_{t-p}^2, \tag{16.1}
\end{align}\]
called the *autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity* (ARCH) model of order \(p\), or short ARCH(\(p\)).^{13} We assume \(\alpha_0>0\) and \(\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_p\geq0\) to ensure a positive variance \(\sigma_t^2>0\). The general idea is apparent from the model structure: positive coefficients \(\alpha_0,\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_p\) imply that recent large squared errors lead to a large variance, and thus large squared errors, in the current period.

The generalized ARCH (GARCH) model, developed by Tim Bollerslev (1986), is an extension of the ARCH model, where \(\sigma^2_t\) is allowed to depend on its own lags and lags of the squared error term. The GARCH(\(p\),\(q\)) model is given by \[\begin{align} \sigma^2_t = \alpha_0 + \alpha_1 u_{t-1}^2 + \alpha_2 u_{t-2}^2 + \dots + \alpha_p u_{t-p}^2 + \phi_1 \sigma^2_{t-1} + \dots + \phi_p \sigma^2_{t-q}. \tag{16.2} \end{align}\] The GARCH model is an ADL(\(p\),\(q\)) model and thus can provide more parsimonious parameterizations than the ARCH model (see the discussion in Appendix 15.2 of the book).

### Application to Stock Price Volatility

Maximum likelihood estimates of ARCH and GARCH models are efficient and have normal distributions in large samples, such that the usual methods for conducting inference about the unknown parameters can be applied. The `R` package `fGarch` is a collection of functions for analyzing and modelling the heteroskedastic behavior in time series models. The following application reproduces the results presented in Chapter 16.5 of the book by means of the function `garchFit()`. This function is somewhat sophisticated. It allows for different specifications of the optimization procedure, different error distributions and much more (use `?GarchFit`

for a detailed description of the arguments). In particular, the reported standard errors reported by `garchFit()` are robust.

The GARCH(\(1\),\(1\)) model of daily changes in the Wilshire 5000 index we estimate is given by \[\begin{align} R_t =& \, \beta_0 + u_t \ , \ u_t \sim \mathcal{N}(0,\sigma^2_t), \\ \sigma^2_t =& \, \alpha_0 + \alpha_1 u_{t-1}^2 + \phi_1 \sigma_{t-1}^2 \tag{16.3} \end{align}\] where \(R_t\) is the percentage change in period \(t\). \(\beta_0\), \(\alpha_0\), \(\alpha_1\) and \(\phi_1\) are unknown coefficients and \(u_t\) is an error term with conditional mean zero. We do not include any lagged predictors in the equation of \(R_t\) because the daily changes in the Wilshire 5000 index reflect daily stock returns which are essentially unpredictable. Note that \(u_t\) is assumed to be normally distributed and the variance \(\sigma^2_t\) depends on \(t\) as it follows the GARCH(\(1\),\(1\)) recursion (16.3).

It is straightforward to estimate this model using `garchFit()`.

```
# estimate GARCH(1,1) model of daily percentage changes
garchFit(data = W5000_PC$Value, trace = F) GARCH_Wilshire <-
```

We obtain \[\begin{align} \widehat{R}_t =& \, \underset{(0.010)}{0.068}, \tag{16.4} \\ \widehat{\sigma}^2_t =& \, \underset{(0.002)}{0.011} + \underset{(0.007)}{0.081} u_{t-1}^2 + \underset{(0.008)}{0.909} \sigma_{t-1}^2, \tag{16.5} \end{align}\] so the coefficients on \(u_{t-1}^2\) and \(\sigma^2_{t-1}\) are statistically significant at any common level of significance. One can show that the persistence of movements in \(\sigma^2_t\) is determined by the sum of both coefficients, which is \(0.99\) here. This indicates that movements in the conditional variance are highly persistent, implying long-lasting periods of high volatility which is consistent with the visual evidence for volatility clustering presented above.

The estimated conditional variance \(\widehat{\sigma}^2_t\) can be computed by plugging the residuals from (16.4) into equation (16.5). This is performed automatically by `garchFit()`, so to obtain the estimated conditional standard deviations \(\widehat{\sigma}_t\) we only have to read out the values from `GARCH_Wilshire` by appending `@sigma.t`.

Using the \(\widehat{\sigma}_t\) we plot bands of \(\pm\) one conditional standard deviation along with deviations of the series of daily percentage changes in the Wilshire 5000 index from its mean. The following code chunk reproduces Figure 16.4 of the book.

```
# compute deviations of the percentage changes from their mean
W5000_PC$Value - GARCH_Wilshire@fit$coef[1]
dev_mean_W5000_PC <-
# plot deviation of percentage changes from mean
plot(W5000_PC$Date, dev_mean_W5000_PC,
type = "l",
col = "steelblue",
ylab = "Percent",
xlab = "Date",
main = "Estimated Bands of +- One Conditional Standard Deviation",
lwd = 0.2)
# add horizontal line at y = 0
abline(0, 0)
# add GARCH(1,1) confidence bands (one standard deviation) to the plot
lines(W5000_PC$Date,
@fit$coef[1] + GARCH_Wilshire@sigma.t,
GARCH_Wilshirecol = "darkred",
lwd = 0.5)
lines(W5000_PC$Date,
@fit$coef[1] - GARCH_Wilshire@sigma.t,
GARCH_Wilshirecol = "darkred",
lwd = 0.5)
```

The bands of the estimated conditional standard deviations track the observed heteroskedasticity in the series of daily changes of the Wilshire 5000 index quite well. This is useful for quantifying the time-varying volatility and the resulting risk for investors holding stocks summarized by the index. Furthermore, this GARCH model may also be used to produce forecast intervals whose widths depend on the volatility of the most recent periods.

### Summary

We have discussed how vector autoregressions are conveniently estimated and used for forecasting in

`R`by means of functions from the`vars`package.The package

`urca`supplies advanced methods for unit root and cointegration analysis like the DF-GLS and the EG-ADF tests. In an application we have found evidence that 3-months and 10-year interest rates have a common stochastic trend (that is, they are cointegrated) and thus can be modeled using a vector error correction model.Furthermore, we have introduced the concept of volatility clustering and demonstrated how the function

`garchFit()`from the package`fGarch`can be employed to estimate a GARCH(\(1\),\(1\)) model of the conditional heteroskedasticity inherent to returns of the Wilshire 5000 stock index.

### References

Bollerslev, Tim. 1986. “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.” *Journal of Econometrics* 31 (3): 307–27.

Engle, Robert. 1982. “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation.” *Econometrica* 50 (4): 987–1007.

Although we introduce the ARCH model as a component in an ADL(\(1\),\(1\)) model, it can be used for modelling the conditional zero-mean error term of any time series model.↩︎